3/5/2023 0 Comments Feudal kingdoms blackspigot![]() Vassals (for instance the Italian city-states), hardly ever fight amongst each other. The AI kingdoms are most offensive to me with their borg-like realms. When vassals break away from me, I usually let them go with my blessing. I'm usually just a duke or minor kinglet with modest, compact demesne and a handful of vassals (usually bishops). So count yourself lucky, cause it kind of makes me want to throw my computer out the window.Īs for me, I hardly ever give out land to my children (and if I must, it is to daughters or aunts, never my sons - they pick up too many nasty habits and get themselves and me into trouble too much otherwise). The strange thing is, everything is peachy keen until they break away.Devotedly Loyal, no real revolt problems, I have an honorable reputation, good diplo values, and there's no succession at the immediate moment. These are members of my dynasty, I didn't expect to have such trouble with them, otherwise I'd have granted them to the random jerks who come in off the street. My direct family (sons and brothers, who sometimes become uncles or cousins) always rules these duchies, but Tyre is the only one that has stayed loyal! Homs and Sinai have broken away with some event about my vassal creating an independent state to better protect these parts of the Holy Land (which is BS, my vassals are idiots and can't even protect themselves from the occasional wandering band of 150 rebels. Had three nice Crusader states in the Holy Land - Duchy of Sinai (which has wavered between 4-5 provinces), Duchy of Homs (2 provinces), and Duchy of Tyre (which has had up to 5 provinces and down to three, depending on various goings-on). Started as Count of Reggio, gradually built up to King of Naples. Yeah, for some reason, I can't keep my frickin' Kingdom together all of a sudden. Multiple King titles should result in a lower diplomacy value. ![]() I rarely see the AI get multiple King titles-but I do see it. If kings and dukes were always fighting, there'd be no resources to crusade and the Kings would lose and then we wouldn't have any Crusader Kings at all and we might as well give up and play colonization which is one of the best games ever so i bought it on amazon a couple of months ago but i can't get it to work on my new computer well actually i can but i have a laptop so i can't move my units diagonally and i can't find my spare keyboard and it turns out that someone threw it away and i don't want to buy a new one just because i can't play colonization when i have several games that i haven't played at all just bought them not played them right and it's a pain in the ass 'cuz colonization was so fun and i can't enjoy it and i'm thinking of doing an aar for crusader kings where i basically just fuck around and make bad decisions because i don't really play any other way. So the game models periods of desperate instability and periods of relative tranquility. But dealing with constant revolts that never ever stop, even when you have a good King sux. Sometimes they rebuild and sometimes they don't. Then you get a bad succession and kingdoms fall to shit.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |